Skip to main content

MMYIF: Who Framed Roger Rabbit

My Misspent Youth In Films...

Who Framed Roger Rabbit
Directed by: Robert Zemeckis
Starring: Bob Hoskins, Christopher Lloyd, Joanna Cassidy
Released: June 22, 1988

A toon-hating detective is a cartoon rabbit's only hope to prove his innocence when he is accused of murder.

What I Thought Then

This was a fun movie that was also a crazy-impressive technical accomplishment starring a rabbit whose comic sensibilities closely mirrored my own. Also, I was always surprised to hear Bob Hoskins' natural accent after seeing this film.

What I Think Now

It's still very impressive, on a technical level. Think about all of the challenges of a modern digital film but without being able to do any compositing. All you can do is draw on the existing frames, and anything you draw will obviously be drawn. That means a lot more effort needs to be made during principal photography to stage the shots for later insertion of animated characters. When a cartoon weasel is holding a real prop gun, that gun had to be on set and moving around in such a way that would be totally concealed by the animation. There are a couple of big set pieces early on that really sell the illusion--notably Jessica Rabbit's nightclub performance and the scene of Roger in the rot-gut room where he keeps bumping the overhead light. Those are so convincing that it's easy to overlook the occasional moment janky animation where characters don't seem to sit right in the moving camera frame.

Of course, anyone will tell you that the real hurdle of making this film was securing the rights to "Golden Age" cartoon characters, including major players from both the Disney and Warner Bros stables. The movie took seven years to make and went through a lot of complex negotiations to get there. Supposedly a sequel has been in some stage of development hell ever since, and given the legal complexities as well as how successful the original was--to say nothing of the fact that the technical side would be far, far less impressive these days--I doubt it will ever actually happen. Which is a good thing, too, because Zemeckis has stated that he has a great script that would involve a digital Bob Hoskins. At some point Zemeckis drank the George Lucas Kool-Aid ("Digital now! Digital tomorrow! Digital forever!"... I'm paraphrasing), his recent animation-heavy films have been a parade of technically impressive dead-eyed soulless drones.

Anywho. Given all of that, it's kind of amazing that this movie is as good as it is. The story feels very true to its noir roots, but it has a lot of cartoon sensibilities and some genuinely hilarious moments (Jessica's answer to what she sees in Roger--"He makes me laugh"--gets me every time). The story's a bit thin, but it holds together well enough. Christpher Lloyd's Judge Doom is a harrowing presence, and Hoskins is wonderfully charismatic, even as he spends most of the movie interacting with characters that aren't there--a skill that was not nearly as prevalent in 1986, when filming started. Kathleen Turner's uncredited voicing of Jessica Rabbit (Oh, hey! Kathleen Turner's in this!) is just note-perfect. And if you want a real treat, check out the casting section of the Wikipedia page and read through all of the actors who were either offered parts and turned them down or who auditioned but were turned away. Imagine Tim Curry as Doom! (Oh, hey! Tim Curry's not in this--he was too scary!)

In terms of things that don't work... I mean, it's a very white movie. I feel like a modern film set in 1947 would have tried to better represent the era's actual racial dynamic. There's an animated bullet that's supposed to be a Native American, and I don't think it would really pass muster to modern eyes. There's a non-trivial amount of casual misogyny. The movie more than implies that toons are second-class citizens, but it doesn't really have anything to say about that; the theme of the movie really starts and ends with "making people laugh is good". A couple of the jokes don't land, and there are a few shots of animation that don't quite composite into the live-action plates that cleanly. The whole idea of making Jessica cartoony by making her boobs bounce the wrong way (no, really, that's what they did) is kinda weird and doesn't really work, but it's not nearly as cringe-worthy as Leena Hyena. But overall these are fairly minor quibbles for thirty-year-old movie.


Yes. It holds up remarkably well, especially if you have nostalgia for Golden Age animation.

Tune in next week for even more input...

In My Misspent Youth In Films, Kurt is going through the movies he grew up on. Read the explainer or see more posts.


Popular posts from this blog

On Getting Laser Eyes

Last week I got Lasik. I was looking forward to not having to deal with glasses getting smudged by my kids or slipping off my face. I figured that not needing them would be pretty convenient. However, the words I heard over and over from other people who'd already done it were: "life-changing." That seemed to be overstating a bit. Convenient, yes, but life-changing? I didn't get it. I get it now. I've had some kind of vision correction, either glasses or contacts, for the last thirty-odd years, which is nearly as far back as I can remember. And what I hadn't realized was the extent to which this had become part of my identity. It's not that I thought glasses were cool because I wore them--although I did and they are. It's that the ability to see was, for me, artificial and temporary. And my vision was pretty bad, so my natural state was one of... not so much "blindness" as "isolation." There was a layer of vagueness that sat bet

Sentinels of the Multiverse: Definitive Edition: A Thoroughly Unnecessary Review

 Time to save the multiverse A couple years ago I was blogging about my love of tabletop games and described Sentinels of the Multiverse  as being either my first or second favorite, depending on what day of the week it was. Then last year they announced a new "Definitive Edition" of the base game with expansion content to follow. This would be a ground-up rethinking and rebalancing that would, amongst other things, be mostly incompatible with the existing content. Of which I have a lot. This has been a "shut-up-and-take-my-money" IP for years now, so it's not like I  wasn't  going to buy it, but I was at first trepidatious. I mean, was this even necessary? And then I saw an interview with the creators where they talked about what they were trying to accomplish with the new edition, and I was on board. And then the Kickstarter launched and more information was available and I got excited. After all, as I mentioned in the above-linked write-up, the oldest Sen

100 Album: "Game Of Thrones Season 3 Soundtrack" by Ramin Djawadi

Kurt is going through his favorite records. Read the  explainer  or view  the master list . Artist:  Ramin Djawadi Title:   Game Of Thrones, Season 3 Soundtrack Released:  2013 Genre:  DAH duh, duh-duh-DAH duh, duh-duh-DAH duh He's not as big a name as Hans Zimmer or John Williams or the various Newmans out there, but Ramin Djawadi is easily the most interesting composer working in television right now (with due respect to Bear McCreary). Soundtracks, especially television soundtracks because they're produced so quickly, have a tendency to serve more as a wall of atmosphere than anything else. But Djawadi's work here and on Westworld  has generated some amazing musical themes. There's a strong undercurrent of leitmotif informing the way the music flows together and the themes those motifs are built around are damned  catchy--which you know if you got the joke in the genre description above. While all of the soundtracks for GoT  are very listenable, this is m