Skip to main content

Bottom Of The 9th (Acquire-To-Zendo)

⚾ Take Me Out To The Ballgame


2015, 2 players
Complexity: light/moderate

Bottom Of The 9th is a two-player bluffing/deduction game played with dice. It pits the underdog home team against the traveling champions in a winner-take-all high-stakes half inning of baseball. The conceit of the game is that by some miracle the underdog home team has kept things at a tie so far, but they're exhausted. If this goes into extra innings, the champions are surely going to beat them. But if they can just score one run in the bottom of the 9th inning, then they win it all.

Let's See It In Action


In Bottom Of The 9th, you and a friend compete head-to-head, one player as the underdog home team, one as the champions. You each pick a roster of players, six for the batting home team and two pitchers for the champions.


Pitching and batting are managed with dice rolls. The pitcher has two dice, one a standard d6, another that has sides labeled "S", "B", and "C" that determine whether the pitch is in the strike zone (S), outside the strike zone (B), or painting the corner of the plate (C). The batter then rolls their swing in an attempt to a) beat an "S" pitch, b) get under or match a "B" pitch, or c) match a "C" pitch perfectly. If they make contact, both players roll their dice in a roll-off and whoever gets a 5 or 6 first gets their preferred outcome--the batter takes a base or the fielder gets an out. If the batter matches an "S" pitch, that's a foul, but if they manage to get a 6 against an "S" pitch of 5 or lower, that's a "crush" and the batter gets an extra roll that could get them an automatic single, double, or a game-winning home run.


Die rolls can be manipulated in a contest call the stare-down, which is the main bluffing/deduction mechanic of the game, that revolves around what type of pitch the pitcher is going to throw. Pitches can be either high or low and either inside or away (up the middle is, apparently, not an option in this game). Each player has two tokens that they use--the pitcher to determine what kind of pitch they're throwing, and the batter to guess. These are set in secret and then revealed at the same time. If the batter guesses either or both directions correctly, then they get an opportunity to manipulate their dice, usually by either re-rolling or incrementing the value up or down by 1. But for each one they get wrong, the pitcher gets to manipulate theirs.


Additionally, the pitcher has an "ace" pitch that is one specific combination of low or high and inside or away. It grants them a bonus that can only be counteracted if the batter guesses both directions correctly. But throwing their ace--or even throwing half of it--fatigues a pitcher's arm, and once they fatigue it completely in either direction, they'll only be able to throw the opposite, meaning that the batter will know what it is and will get lots of die-manipulation bonuses. So the pitcher is incentivized to either throw their ace or save their arm, but doing on those two pitches will make them too predictable. And that's where the bluffing and deduction comes in, as the pitcher and batter try to psych each other out. Because if the home team scores at all, they win.


...As in real life

What Makes It So Good?

Call me a traitor to my baseball-loving city of St. Louis, but I find it to be an overall dull sport punctuated by occasional moments of excitement and tension. Bottom Of The 9th distills that excitement and tension down to a single half inning in which everything is on the line. The game finds a good way to balance the randomness of a dice-rolling game against the intentionality of player choice in a way that feels very true to baseball. Yes, whether you hit or not and how hard you hit are determined by chance, but if you can guess which way the pitcher is going to throw, then you can at least have some affect on it.

The game leans hard into its aesthetic, and it's great. The batters and pitchers are baseball cards with their unique rules listed on the back as though they were stats. You track balls and strikes on what looks like a stick of gum--the kind you'd get in a pack of baseball cards. The player names and teams are all delightfully goofy, with art to match. It's a short game too, playing out in around ten minutes or so, and while it has some complexity, it's simple enough that I can play it against my children and they have a decent shot at winning. (In the game I played to take these photos, my 8-year-old did in fact win.)

What's Not To Like?

Despite the different character powers, there's not much player choice apart from the bluffing/deduction mechanic, meaning the game doesn't have a lot of varied gameplay unless you play it against a number of different people.

Is It Expansible?

Yes, almost too expansible, actually. There are a couple of small expansions that add new players and give the game a bit more depth, including a Sentinels Of The Multiverse crossover expansion. On the other hand, there's a big Clubhouse expansion that's also an upgraded storage solution and it really adds too much. This is a game that takes ten minutes to play. It doesn't need a campaign mode or a budget you use to draft power-ups as part of the setup.

There is also a digital version from Handelabra that's pretty good.

Final Thoughts

It's a small game, but a fun one, one that knows and enjoys its aesthetics and flat-out refuses to take itself too seriously. The way it balances bluffing and dice-rolling manages to evoke baseball surprisingly well.

Tune in next week when we troll the underwater depths with Captain Sonar...

In Acquire-To-Zendo, Kurt is going through his favorite board games in alphabetical order. Read the explainer or see more posts.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Alexandra Rowland And Bad Faith Accusations

This morning, writing twitter was blown up by a post from Alexandra Rowland accusing Scott Lynch and Elizabeth Bear of some nasty manipulative behavior. I have reason to believe that Rowland is acting in bad faith.

Seven or eight years ago, Rowland and I were in the same writing group. I didn't know them well, but we became Facebook friends because that's what you do. At some point after we fell out of contact with each other, they made a post about an affair with an influential older male who had lied about being in an open marriage and proceeded to manipulate and gaslight and emotionally abuse them.

I didn't know any of the people involved other than Rowland, but I was affected enough by Rowland’s post that I can still recall reading it all these years later. So when I saw Rowland's blog this morning, I assumed it was the same situation... except the dates weren't right. The Bear/Lynch events took place in 2016, but the post I remembered was older than that. So I w…

100 Album: "Game Of Thrones Season 3 Soundtrack" by Ramin Djawadi

Kurt is going through his favorite records. Read the explainer or view the master list.

Artist: Ramin Djawadi
Title:Game Of Thrones, Season 3 Soundtrack
Released: 2013
Genre: DAH duh, duh-duh-DAH duh, duh-duh-DAH duh


He's not as big a name as Hans Zimmer or John Williams or the various Newmans out there, but Ramin Djawadi is easily the most interesting composer working in television right now (with due respect to Bear McCreary). Soundtracks, especially television soundtracks because they're produced so quickly, have a tendency to serve more as a wall of atmosphere than anything else. But Djawadi's work here and on Westworld has generated some amazing musical themes. There's a strong undercurrent of leitmotif informing the way the music flows together and the themes those motifs are built around are damned catchy--which you know if you got the joke in the genre description above.

While all of the soundtracks for GoT are very listenable, this is my favorite. It has A Lannist…

On Getting Laser Eyes

Last week I got Lasik. I was looking forward to not having to deal with glasses getting smudged by my kids or slipping off my face. I figured that not needing them would be pretty convenient. However, the words I heard over and over from other people who'd already done it were: "life-changing." That seemed to be overstating a bit. Convenient, yes, but life-changing? I didn't get it.

I get it now.

I've had some kind of vision correction, either glasses or contacts, for the last thirty-odd years, which is nearly as far back as I can remember. And what I hadn't realized was the extent to which this had become part of my identity. It's not that I thought glasses were cool because I wore them--although I did and they are. It's that the ability to see was, for me, artificial and temporary. And my vision was pretty bad, so my natural state was one of... not so much "blindness" as "isolation." There was a layer of vagueness that sat betwee…