Skip to main content

War Chest (Acquire-To-Zendo)

⚔️ What Is It Good For, Absolutely Nothing...



2018, 2 or 4 players
Complexity: moderate

The old general arrived on the heir to the throne's birthday and presented him with a gift: a chest that he claimed contained all the knowledge he would need in order to rule. Inside was a set of coins and some instructions...

Let's See It In Action


In War Chest, you and your opponent will square off to take control of the field of battle. It can be played one-on-one or two-on-two (for the duration, I will be assuming that it is one-on-one, but the rules don't change all that much if you're playing in teams).


Each player has four units under their control, each of which is made up of four or five coins. There are sixteen total in the base game, and the composition of your army can be predetermined--the rulebook contains a recommended first game setup, as well as setups designed to evoke specific historical battles--or decided via snake draft.


Each unit is unique, having either a specific tactic or some sort of rule that applies to them specifically. At the start of the game, you will take two coins from each stack as well as a royal coin that is not aligned with any specific unit and place these nine coins in your draw bag. On each turn, you will draw a hand of three coins from the bag.


There is an initiative coin that determines which player takes the first turn each round. On your turn, you will play a coin from your hand in one of a handful of ways. These are broken out into Placement actions, Face-Down actions, and Face-Up actions.


A Placement action involves adding the token from your hand to the board. New units can be put into play on any of your control points, represented on the board above by the grey bird and the gold wolf tokens. You only start with two control points, so moving getting your pieces into play is going to take a some doing. You can only have one of each unit on the board (with one exception--the Footman can have two), so if you already have a unit in the field, you can Bolster it by placing a matching coin from your hand on top of the stack that is already in play.


Face-Down actions are taken by placing any coin from your hand face-down in your discard area. You can do this in order to recruit a new unit--take a coin of any unit from your supply and add it to your discard area. Additionally, you can discard a face-down coin in order to claim initiative, meaning you get to take the first turn every round. Finally, you can discard a face-down coin to pass. You suspend your turns until you decide to come back in. (I've played this game many times, and I don't think I've ever seen anyone actually do this.)


Face-Up actions are how you manipulate pieces on the board. You can discard a coin from your hand and make the matching unit on the board perform one of three actions. The unit can move one hex. The unit can attack an adjacent unit, removing one coin from the stack if it is bolstered and removing it from the board if not (attacked tokens do not go back into the supply but are removed from the game). If a unit has a tactic, then you may invoke that as a Face-Up action as well. Finally, if the unit is on a controllable hex, you may discard a face-up coin matching that unit in order to place one of your control markers there.


Once both players have played all the coins from their hands, they draw a new hand of three and commence the next round. If a player's draw bag runs out, they refill it from the coins in their discard area. Play continues until player has placed all six of their control tokens (or all eight in a team game), at which point, they are the victor.

What Makes It So Good?

War Chest is a hybrid of two of my favorite genres of game. It's primarily an abstract strategy game, but players use deck-building mechanics in order to manage their armies. And it marries the two together brilliantly. You are constantly having to balance the strength of your units in play against your ability to actually do anything with them. The more pieces in your stack on the board, the fewer are in your bag. You also need to pay close attention to the composition of your draw bag. The fewer coins you have in it, the faster you'll cycle through, but it limits your ability to add tokens to the board.

The variety in units means that every game is going to be different, and the unit strengths are fairly well balanced. There's the lancer who can move two hexes and attack. There's the archer that can attack two hexes away, but not adjacent. There's the crossbow unit that can attack one or two hexes away but only in an unobstructed straight line. Beserkers can sacrifice from their stack for extra movement. Ensigns can move nearby units and marshals can make nearby units attack. You have both light and heavy cavalry that behave similarly but different enough to be distinct. It makes for a nice collection where no one unit really overpowers the rest.

And the components are just delightful. The coins are poker chips with solid iconography and the bags are nice quality. It's a great tactile sensation overall. And the box actually looks like a chest with a fancy magnetic lid.

What's Not To Like?

If you don't like abstract strategy or deck/pool-building, then give this one a pass, maybe? But honestly, the game is near perfect.

Is It Expansible?

There is a Nobility expansion that adds some decree mechanics and a few new units and some upgraded pieces for the base game. It's quite good, but non-essential.

Final Thoughts

One of the best abstract strategy games to come out in the last few years.

Tune in next week when we become doomed in We're Doomed!...

In Acquire-To-Zendo, Kurt is going through his favorite board games in alphabetical order. Read the explainer or see more posts.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Alexandra Rowland And Bad Faith Accusations

This morning, writing twitter was blown up by a post from Alexandra Rowland accusing Scott Lynch and Elizabeth Bear of some nasty manipulative behavior. I have reason to believe that Rowland is acting in bad faith. Seven or eight years ago, Rowland and I were in the same writing group. I didn't know them well, but we became Facebook friends because that's what you do. At some point after we fell out of contact with each other, they made a post about an affair with an influential older male who had lied about being in an open marriage and proceeded to manipulate and gaslight and emotionally abuse them. I didn't know any of the people involved other than Rowland, but I was affected enough by Rowland’s post that I can still recall reading it all these years later. So when I saw Rowland's blog this morning, I assumed it was the same situation... except the dates weren't right. The Bear/Lynch events took place in 2016, but the post I remembered was older than that. So I

100 Album: "Game Of Thrones Season 3 Soundtrack" by Ramin Djawadi

Kurt is going through his favorite records. Read the  explainer  or view  the master list . Artist:  Ramin Djawadi Title:   Game Of Thrones, Season 3 Soundtrack Released:  2013 Genre:  DAH duh, duh-duh-DAH duh, duh-duh-DAH duh He's not as big a name as Hans Zimmer or John Williams or the various Newmans out there, but Ramin Djawadi is easily the most interesting composer working in television right now (with due respect to Bear McCreary). Soundtracks, especially television soundtracks because they're produced so quickly, have a tendency to serve more as a wall of atmosphere than anything else. But Djawadi's work here and on Westworld  has generated some amazing musical themes. There's a strong undercurrent of leitmotif informing the way the music flows together and the themes those motifs are built around are damned  catchy--which you know if you got the joke in the genre description above. While all of the soundtracks for GoT  are very listenable, this is m

On Getting Laser Eyes

Last week I got Lasik. I was looking forward to not having to deal with glasses getting smudged by my kids or slipping off my face. I figured that not needing them would be pretty convenient. However, the words I heard over and over from other people who'd already done it were: "life-changing." That seemed to be overstating a bit. Convenient, yes, but life-changing? I didn't get it. I get it now. I've had some kind of vision correction, either glasses or contacts, for the last thirty-odd years, which is nearly as far back as I can remember. And what I hadn't realized was the extent to which this had become part of my identity. It's not that I thought glasses were cool because I wore them--although I did and they are. It's that the ability to see was, for me, artificial and temporary. And my vision was pretty bad, so my natural state was one of... not so much "blindness" as "isolation." There was a layer of vagueness that sat bet