Skip to main content

Why First? (Acquire-To-Zendo)

🥈 We're Number 2! We're Number 2! We're Number...


2015, 2-6 players
Complexity: light

What is victory? Why do we place so much emphasis on winning? This is the deeply philosophical question at the root of Why First?, which is a deeply silly small-box party game.

Let's See It In Action


In Why First?, you and two to five friends (there are separate rules for two-players, but it's intended to be played with at least three) are racing pawns up and down a track. Although "track" is misleading, as it's less a distance to be covered than it is a place where pawns are ranked.


Each player has a hand of five cards. Play is simultaneous. All at once, each player selects one card from their hand and places it in front of any player they want to. Multiple people can play a card in front of the same player. Players can play a card in front of themselves. Each player then advances (or backtracks) their pawn based on the value of the cards played in front of them. Repeat until you have only one card left. The last card must be placed in front of its owner.


Once all five cards have been played, the round is over. Whichever pawn or pawns are in second place score points equal to the space they're on. In the picture below, yellow would score two points, and no one else would score any. Yes, it is possible to score negative points. And it is often desirable to do so. You then reset the pawns at 0 and deal out a new hand of cards. After five rounds, the game is over. Tally up the scores and whoever has the most points... loses. The player with the second-highest score, on the other hand, is the winner.


As in real life...

What Makes It So Good?

Why First? is the game I break out on day four of the gaming conference--when everyone's brain is fried from learning rules, we're waiting around for the organizers to announce the door prize winners, and we want to play something goofy that's kind of mindless but also kind of engaging. Why First? fits the bill perfectly. It can be taught in about thirty seconds and gameplay is fast and chaotic. But there's a deceptive little strategic element there that becomes glaringly obvious after the first round, when someone has worked very hard to score points only to realize that if the game ended then, they would be the only person to not win because they are in first place and everyone else is tied at 0.

Subsequent rounds then become about positioning. I need Bryan to score at negative 3 points so I'll be in second place. Or I need to score at least 3 points, but no more than five, because then I'll overtake Sam. And within a round, you're playing your cards to mess with other players while figuring out which card to hold back, knowing that you have to play your last card in front of yourself. Do you try to minimize your movement at the end, or do you hold back a +5 so you can leap ahead when it's too late for anyone to do anything about it.

Invariably, a lot of players are thinking the same thing and their small efforts to nudge each other compound and send pawns flung off to the far ends of the board, and then you need to put a lot of effort into getting them back. It makes for a hectic game that's surprising and a lot of fun.

What's Not To Like?

The first play of the first round can cause some analysis paralysis because nobody has any idea what to do. I would love a larger board that laid flatter. The board it comes with is so small and gets folded in half to fit in the box, so it ends up not laying completely flat.

And if you don't like chaotic games like Fluxx or We Didn't Playtest This At All because they mess with your sense of strategy, then this one won't be for you.

Is It Expansible?

God, I hope not. How would that even work?

Final Thoughts

This is one of my favorite filler games. It's short and unique always gets a laugh, and it does so without telling poop jokes.

Tune in next week when we build an avian sanctuary in Wingspan...

In Acquire-To-Zendo, Kurt is going through his favorite board games in alphabetical order. Read the explainer or see more posts.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Alexandra Rowland And Bad Faith Accusations

This morning, writing twitter was blown up by a post from Alexandra Rowland accusing Scott Lynch and Elizabeth Bear of some nasty manipulative behavior. I have reason to believe that Rowland is acting in bad faith. Seven or eight years ago, Rowland and I were in the same writing group. I didn't know them well, but we became Facebook friends because that's what you do. At some point after we fell out of contact with each other, they made a post about an affair with an influential older male who had lied about being in an open marriage and proceeded to manipulate and gaslight and emotionally abuse them. I didn't know any of the people involved other than Rowland, but I was affected enough by Rowland’s post that I can still recall reading it all these years later. So when I saw Rowland's blog this morning, I assumed it was the same situation... except the dates weren't right. The Bear/Lynch events took place in 2016, but the post I remembered was older than that. So I

100 Album: "Game Of Thrones Season 3 Soundtrack" by Ramin Djawadi

Kurt is going through his favorite records. Read the  explainer  or view  the master list . Artist:  Ramin Djawadi Title:   Game Of Thrones, Season 3 Soundtrack Released:  2013 Genre:  DAH duh, duh-duh-DAH duh, duh-duh-DAH duh He's not as big a name as Hans Zimmer or John Williams or the various Newmans out there, but Ramin Djawadi is easily the most interesting composer working in television right now (with due respect to Bear McCreary). Soundtracks, especially television soundtracks because they're produced so quickly, have a tendency to serve more as a wall of atmosphere than anything else. But Djawadi's work here and on Westworld  has generated some amazing musical themes. There's a strong undercurrent of leitmotif informing the way the music flows together and the themes those motifs are built around are damned  catchy--which you know if you got the joke in the genre description above. While all of the soundtracks for GoT  are very listenable, this is m

On Getting Laser Eyes

Last week I got Lasik. I was looking forward to not having to deal with glasses getting smudged by my kids or slipping off my face. I figured that not needing them would be pretty convenient. However, the words I heard over and over from other people who'd already done it were: "life-changing." That seemed to be overstating a bit. Convenient, yes, but life-changing? I didn't get it. I get it now. I've had some kind of vision correction, either glasses or contacts, for the last thirty-odd years, which is nearly as far back as I can remember. And what I hadn't realized was the extent to which this had become part of my identity. It's not that I thought glasses were cool because I wore them--although I did and they are. It's that the ability to see was, for me, artificial and temporary. And my vision was pretty bad, so my natural state was one of... not so much "blindness" as "isolation." There was a layer of vagueness that sat bet