Skip to main content

Acquire (Acquire-To-Zendo)

💰 The First Eurogame

1964, 3-6 players
Complexity: light/moderate

Okay, maybe it's not the first eurogame, but Acquire was an early success and remains one of the most influential. Designed by Sid Sackson, it became wildly popular in Germany in the 60s and then throughout Europe. In the post-war era, it turns out, Germans weren't too interested in games like Risk and Monopoly that focused on either global conquest or the quick acquisition of property. So a new genre of board game emerged that placed more emphasis on social play and strategy rather than luck and direct competition. They tended to be easy to learn but difficult to master. And, in contrast to a Risk or Monopoly where you win by eliminating all the other players, eurogames allow all players to play all the way through to the end and instead have some gameplay mechanism to trigger the endgame.

Acquire became the template that other eurogames would build on. Love Ticket To Ride or Power Grid? Well, you have Acquire to thank for that. It's not super well-known in The States because eurogames didn't really catch on here until Settlers Of Catan crossed over in the mid 90s, but it's much-beloved in Europe.

Let's See It In Action

In Acquire, you and two-to-five of your friends are venture capitalists investing in emerging hotel chains. You have a number of tiles in front of you (similar to Scrabble) that correspond to squares on the game board. On your turn, you take one of your tiles and play it on the board. If you place it next to an existing tile, then, congratulations, you've formed a hotel chain. Take one of the markers and place it on your chain. Every subsequent tile that gets added to the chain makes the hotel bigger.

At the end of your turn, you have the option to buy up to three stock certificates in a hotel that has been placed on the board. The price of the stock is contingent on how big the chain is, so if you buy early, you get a better price than someone who comes in later. Stock is important because, eventually, two hotel chains are going to bump into each other. When that happens, the larger chain invokes the title of the game and acquires the smaller one. The stock-owners in the smaller chain get bought out and the major and minor shareholders in both chains get hefty bonuses. The acquired chain gets recycled back into the supply, and the game continues.

There are a number of conditions that might trigger end-of-game, but the one I've mostly seen is a hotel growing to 41 tiles. At that point, everyone sells off their remaining stock and whoever has the most money is the winner!

As in real life.

What Makes It So Good?

There's a simple elegance to a good eurogame. The objective is clear and the rules are straightforward. The strategy comes in how you position yourself to be bought out. You have a handful of tiles in front of you that may be able to cause two hotels to merge. Can you get enough stock in one of them to get a bonus when you trigger the acquisition? You have a limited number of buys and--early on--a fairly small amount of money to spend, so how do you manage your resources in order to maximize your payout? It's the kind of game where you can feel like you're just one turn behind where you need to be, which keeps things fairly tense and engaging. But, on the other hand, there's not a mechanism for you to target other players, and it's generally not clear who's winning until the final scoring happens, so while it can be a tense game, it's rarely mean or aggressive.

What's Not To Like?

While Acquire is a lot of fun, it's very mathy. The schedule of stock prices is not something you can just memorize, because it varies by hotel size and across classes of hotels. Some are just more expensive than others because they are. So you spend a lot of game time consulting charts and adding up numbers in your head. Also, the play-time is a little on the long side for a modern eurogame. The box says 90 minutes, but even with experienced players, you're looking at a good hour at least.

I have a slightly older edition that was mass produced with some fairly flimsy pieces and doesn't include rules for two players, which irks me. It's hard to play a game in my household that requires a minimum of three players. Although it looks like newer editions have more robust components and two-player rules. THAT SAID, a lot of games that realistically need three players or more will include a two-player variant that kind of sucks. I don't know if that's the case here or not.

The other potential drawback is the price point. A new copy is going to run you around $35. You'll get nicer components than what I have, but that's over twice as much as you'd pay for a basic copy of Monopoly--which is the game it gets most often compared to.

Is It Expansible?

Not to my knowledge. This game is older than the idea of expansions, and it's very complete as is. I don't know what about it could be expanded. As popular as it was, I'm a little surprised that it hasn't been branded into different editions, though. Why isn't Acquire: Game Of Thrones a thing?

Final Thoughts

Acquire is kind of like The Velvet Underground in that it's important mostly because it's been so influential. It feels like a bit of a relic, and a lot of the mechanics have been better implemented by more recent games, but it still holds up really well. As mentioned above, it's generally offered as a smarter, friendlier, funner alternative to Monopoly, and while I will defend Monopoly (that's a post for another day, I suppose), Acquire is definitely the better of the two.

Tune in next week, when we'll journey to the end of days to defend humanity against the horrific monsters of Aeon's End...

In Acquire-To-Zendo, Kurt is going through his favorite board games in alphabetical order. Read the explainer or see more posts.


Kathy Schrenk said…
Defend Monopoly!?! You monster.

Also, we call it "Funkenschlag" in our house because it's fun to say!

Popular posts from this blog

Alexandra Rowland And Bad Faith Accusations

This morning, writing twitter was blown up by a post from Alexandra Rowland accusing Scott Lynch and Elizabeth Bear of some nasty manipulative behavior. I have reason to believe that Rowland is acting in bad faith.

Seven or eight years ago, Rowland and I were in the same writing group. I didn't know them well, but we became Facebook friends because that's what you do. At some point after we fell out of contact with each other, they made a post about an affair with an influential older male who had lied about being in an open marriage and proceeded to manipulate and gaslight and emotionally abuse them.

I didn't know any of the people involved other than Rowland, but I was affected enough by Rowland’s post that I can still recall reading it all these years later. So when I saw Rowland's blog this morning, I assumed it was the same situation... except the dates weren't right. The Bear/Lynch events took place in 2016, but the post I remembered was older than that. So I w…

My Recent Experience With Daily Science Fiction

Update: On March 3rd, they re-issued my story with a blanket apology to the subscribers for the error. In terms of fixing the original mistake, this feels both thorough and sincere. They have still not reached out or responded to me personally. If and when that changes, I will note it here.

Update: On March 21st, Jonathan apologized via email for the mixup. As far as I'm concerned, the matter is now settled.

If you follow Daily Science Fiction, then you probably saw this morning's email that started "Major glitches on the spaceship DSF" and you may be wondering what some of that was about. Well, this is what some of that was about.

So I recently had a story accepted by Daily Science Fiction called Marla Corbet: Living (With The Invaders). (I never got around to a formal announcement, so if you'd like to read it, you can find it here. It's a very silly thing about an ersatz Martha Stewart. And human hair. And alien poop. You'll love it.) It was accepted on …

100 Album: "Game Of Thrones Season 3 Soundtrack" by Ramin Djawadi

Kurt is going through his favorite records. Read the explainer or view the master list.

Artist: Ramin Djawadi
Title:Game Of Thrones, Season 3 Soundtrack
Released: 2013
Genre: DAH duh, duh-duh-DAH duh, duh-duh-DAH duh

He's not as big a name as Hans Zimmer or John Williams or the various Newmans out there, but Ramin Djawadi is easily the most interesting composer working in television right now (with due respect to Bear McCreary). Soundtracks, especially television soundtracks because they're produced so quickly, have a tendency to serve more as a wall of atmosphere than anything else. But Djawadi's work here and on Westworld has generated some amazing musical themes. There's a strong undercurrent of leitmotif informing the way the music flows together and the themes those motifs are built around are damned catchy--which you know if you got the joke in the genre description above.

While all of the soundtracks for GoT are very listenable, this is my favorite. It has A Lannist…