Skip to main content

Dixit (Acquire-To-Zendo)

🖼️ He Said / She Said



2008, 3-6 players
Complexity: light

So you want to play a game. You want something kinda whimsical. Maybe a little childish, but more in a dreamlike way. Something you could play with your kids and significant other, but maybe something you could play in a room full of half-drunk adults. Look no further.

Let's See It In Action


In Dixit, you and two to five friends (who are all rabbits for some reason) will alternate in the role of Storyteller, describing a picture that the other players will have to guess. Each player has a set of voting tokens that varies depending on the number of players. You draw a hand of six cards. The Storyteller then chooses one of their cards and describes it. It could be a word, a phrase, a song, a guttural noise. The rules are pretty flexible.


Each player picks a card from their hand that they feel best matches the clue. The cards are shuffled and laid out above the board. For example, in the above image, the clue might have been something like "Woe is me." Once the cards are laid out, each player then uses their numbered tokens to vote on which card they believe is the real one that was selected by the Storyteller. The guesses are revealed and the players score accordingly.


If everyone guesses correctly, then the clue was too easy. The Storyteller gets no points and everyone else gets two. Similarly, if nobody guesses correctly, then the clue was too hard and points are awarded the same way. However, if at least one but not everyone guesses correctly, the Storyteller gets three points and the players who guessed correctly get three points, along with bonus points if anyone incorrectly guessed their card. At the end of the round, you draw up to six cards and the next player becomes the Storyteller. First person to thirty points wins.


As in real life...

What Makes It So Good?

The nice thing about party games is that they're easy to learn, easy to teach, play quickly, and involve a decent amount of player interaction. One of the nice offshoots of that--for this game in particular--is that the level of difficulty scales pretty cleanly with the experience level of the players. Since you're trying to be not-too-vague but also not-too-obvious, you have to change the way you play if you're playing against children and family as opposed to a bunch of casual gaming friends as opposed to a troupe of hardcore gaming enthusiasts.

There's no downtime, to speak of--everyone has something to do each turn. The art is pretty amazing... with some caveats that I'll get to in a minute. There's a level of whimsy built into the aesthetic that's pretty dang appealing. You play as rabbits for Pete's sake.

What's Not To Like?

The art in the base game is not great--don't get me wrong, it looks amazing, but from a gameplay perspective it's only so-so. This is clearly something they've iterated on in the years since it came out. Future expansions with new art packs have slightly more complex art that gives you more to work with in terms of connecting pictures to topics.

Also, while it's technically playable with three or four, it's much better with five or six, which can make it a little harder to bring to the table. Meanwhile, it's not uncommon in a five or six player game for someone to take an early lead and then everyone else is just waiting for the game to end. If someone is at twenty points and everyone else is at ten, the winner is pretty much determined even though there's still several rounds left to play. Fortunately it's a relatively short game, so this isn't too cumbersome, but it can make the game less fun for inexperienced players.

Finally, this is a party game, so you can have a very uneven experience depending on the company you play it with.

Is It Expansible?

Why, yes! It's more of a game engine than anything else, and there are a number of expansions that don't modify gameplay at all but just add new art packs that can either be mixed in with the originals or played on their own. Make sure that you really want to mix them together before you commit to it, though, because there's not an easy way to separate them again.

Our favorite expansion is Memories, but in addition to that there's Odyssey, Journey, Daydreams, Revelations, Origins, Mirrors, Quest, Harmonies, and Anniversary. Things get a little confusing, since there is a version of Journey that provides a game board and tokens and Odyssey is kind of a standalone but not. There's also a 10th Anniversary that may or may not be different from Anniversary. There are also dozens of stand-alone promo cards and promo card packs. Just... don't try to be a completionist on this one, it will only drive you nuts.

Final Thoughts

I have a lot of affection for this game. It scratches a creative itch that you don't normally get to satisfy in tabletop games, and it's squishy enough that I can play it with my kids and everyone has a good time.

Tune in next week when we consolidate power and territory in Dominion...

In Acquire-To-Zendo, Kurt is going through his favorite board games in alphabetical order. Read the explainer or see more posts.

Comments

Natalka said…
We love this game in my family! But it is really hard to play with three people, because you have a 50% chance of just guessing which is the storyteller's card. To make it a bit more fun, we made up "Random Bunny": a fictitious 4th player who kicks in the top card of the deck each time. The cards are vague enough that "Random Bunny" has come up with some surprisingly apt "choices".

A real challenge in playing with 2 adults and 1 kid is not falling into a pattern of making allusions that the other adult gets but the kid won't get. Our kid is six, so any reference to adult pop culture will shoot over his head like a falling star.

Popular posts from this blog

Alexandra Rowland And Bad Faith Accusations

This morning, writing twitter was blown up by a post from Alexandra Rowland accusing Scott Lynch and Elizabeth Bear of some nasty manipulative behavior. I have reason to believe that Rowland is acting in bad faith.

Seven or eight years ago, Rowland and I were in the same writing group. I didn't know them well, but we became Facebook friends because that's what you do. At some point after we fell out of contact with each other, they made a post about an affair with an influential older male who had lied about being in an open marriage and proceeded to manipulate and gaslight and emotionally abuse them.

I didn't know any of the people involved other than Rowland, but I was affected enough by Rowland’s post that I can still recall reading it all these years later. So when I saw Rowland's blog this morning, I assumed it was the same situation... except the dates weren't right. The Bear/Lynch events took place in 2016, but the post I remembered was older than that. So I w…

100 Album: "Game Of Thrones Season 3 Soundtrack" by Ramin Djawadi

Kurt is going through his favorite records. Read the explainer or view the master list.

Artist: Ramin Djawadi
Title:Game Of Thrones, Season 3 Soundtrack
Released: 2013
Genre: DAH duh, duh-duh-DAH duh, duh-duh-DAH duh


He's not as big a name as Hans Zimmer or John Williams or the various Newmans out there, but Ramin Djawadi is easily the most interesting composer working in television right now (with due respect to Bear McCreary). Soundtracks, especially television soundtracks because they're produced so quickly, have a tendency to serve more as a wall of atmosphere than anything else. But Djawadi's work here and on Westworld has generated some amazing musical themes. There's a strong undercurrent of leitmotif informing the way the music flows together and the themes those motifs are built around are damned catchy--which you know if you got the joke in the genre description above.

While all of the soundtracks for GoT are very listenable, this is my favorite. It has A Lannist…

On Getting Laser Eyes

Last week I got Lasik. I was looking forward to not having to deal with glasses getting smudged by my kids or slipping off my face. I figured that not needing them would be pretty convenient. However, the words I heard over and over from other people who'd already done it were: "life-changing." That seemed to be overstating a bit. Convenient, yes, but life-changing? I didn't get it.

I get it now.

I've had some kind of vision correction, either glasses or contacts, for the last thirty-odd years, which is nearly as far back as I can remember. And what I hadn't realized was the extent to which this had become part of my identity. It's not that I thought glasses were cool because I wore them--although I did and they are. It's that the ability to see was, for me, artificial and temporary. And my vision was pretty bad, so my natural state was one of... not so much "blindness" as "isolation." There was a layer of vagueness that sat betwee…